Issue - meetings

An application for a Premises Licence in respect of First Class Lounge, 6 School Street, Wolverhampton, WV1 4LR was considered following representations received from the Licensing Authority, Environmental Health, West Midlands Fire Service and Public Health.

Jaswinder Kaur, Democratic Services Manager, welcomed all parties to the hearing and explained that the meeting would be conducted in line with The Local Authorities and Police and Crime Panels (Coronavirus) (Flexibility of Local Authority and Police and Crime Panel Meetings) (England and Wales) Regulations 2020. She invited all parties to introduce themselves and all parties did so.

The Chair welcomed all parties to the hearing and outlined the procedure to be followed. All parties confirmed that they understood the procedure.

Debra Craner, Section Leader Licensing, provided an outline of the application. She reported that shortly before the Hearing an application to transfer the premises licence had been submitted by the Applicant but was incomplete.

Mr Ese Adams-Aliu, Solicitor representing the Applicant, confirmed that the summary provided was accurate but questioned why the application to transfer the premises licence was incomplete.

Debra Craner, Section Leader Licensing, explained that the application did not specify which floor of the premises was to be transferred and that a box certifying the Applicant was over 18 had not been ticked.

The Chair sought legal advice on the matter, and it was agreed that as the issues were minor the hearing would continue and the Applicant would submit a complete transfer application during a break in the proceedings.

The Chair invited the Applicant to present the application.

Mr Ese Adams-Aliu, Solicitor representing the Applicant, did so as per

Appendix 1 of the report. He stated that his client had worked closely with the Responsible Authorities throughout the application process and had made amendments to their application following mediation with West Midlands Police.

The Chair afforded all parties present the opportunity to question Mr Ese Adams-Aliu in relation to his submission.

In response to questions asked, Mr Ese Adams-Aliu outlined his understanding of the Cumulative Impact Zone and discussed his client’s proposals in relation to security, planning permission, noise nuisance, and fire safety.

The Sub-Committee adjourned at 13.15 hours for a short break

The Hearing reconvened at 13.30 hours.

The Chair invited the Licensing Authority to make representations. Elaine Moreton, Section Leader Licensing, did so as per Appendix 4 of the report.

The Chair afforded all parties present the opportunity to question the Licensing Authority in relation to its submission. No questions were asked.

The Chair invited Environmental Health to make representations. Emma Waites, Senior Officer,Food and Consumer Safety, did so as per appendix 5 of the report.

The Chair afforded all parties present the opportunity to question Environmental Health in relation to its submission. No questions were asked.

The Chair invited Public Health to make representations. Gurjinder Bans, Senior Public Health Specialist, did so as per appendix 7 of the report.

The Chair afforded all parties present the opportunity to question Public Health in relation to its  ...  view the full minutes text for item 3

An application for a Premises Licence in respect of First Class Lounge, 6 School Street, Wolverhampton, WV1 4LR was considered following representations received from the Licensing Authority, Environmental Health, West Midlands Fire Service and Public Health.

Jaswinder Kaur, Democratic Services Manager, welcomed all parties to the hearing and explained that the meeting would be conducted in line with The Local Authorities and Police and Crime Panels (Coronavirus) (Flexibility of Local Authority and Police and Crime Panel Meetings) (England and Wales) Regulations 2020. She invited all parties to introduce themselves and all parties did so.

The Chair welcomed all parties to the hearing and outlined the procedure to be followed. All parties confirmed that they understood the procedure.

Debra Craner, Section Leader Licensing, outlined the application and stated that since the agenda had been published it had been discovered that the premises, 6 School Street, Wolverhampton, WV1 4LR, already had two existing premises licences in place. She confirmed that one licence was for the ground floor of the premises and was held by Mr Erastus Ndi, the Applicant. The other licence was for the first floor and was held by a third party.

The Chair requested legal advice on how the continue in light of the new information. Sarah Hardwick, Senior Solicitor, explained the options available to the Sub-Committee.

The Chair invited the Applicant to discuss the existing premises licences.

Mr Ese Adams-Aliu, Solicitor representing the Applicant, stated that the holder of the first floor licence was willing to surrender the licence and that his client wished to continue with the hearing.

Councillor Bolshaw, Councillor Crofts, Councillor Inston, the Senior Solicitor and Democratic Services Officer, withdrew from the meeting to enable the Sub-Committee to determine the matter.

The Sub-Committee adjourned at 10.24 hours.

The Hearing reconvened at 10.49 hours.

Councillor Bolshaw, Councillor Crofts, Councillor Inston, the Senior Solicitor and Democratic Services Officer re-joined the meeting.

The Chair advised all parties of the decision of the Sub-Committee, which was read out by the Senior Solicitor.

Resolved:

In accordance with The Licensing Act 2003 (Hearings) Regulations 2005 the Statutory Licensing Sub Committee decided to adjourn the hearing to a specified date, that being 29 May 2020, in the public interest.

The reason for adjournment was as follows:

The Statutory Licensing Sub-Committee accepted that paragraph 8.19 of the s182 Guidance provided that there was nothing in the 2003 Act which prevented an application being made for a premises licence at premises where a premises licence was already held. However, whilst the Act was silent on this point it did make provision for transfer and surrender of a licence.

The Licensing Sub-Committee considered that, in principle, it would be possible to hear the application today on the basis that, in the event the application was granted, a condition could be applied to any resulting licence that any pre-existing licence be surrendered. However, theLicensing Sub-Committee noted that the existing licence for the first floor was not held by the applicant, he therefore had no  ...  view the full minutes text for item 3