The
Committee considered a report regarding 20/00832/FUL - Demolition of
existing warehouse buildings and construction of Costa Coffee
Drive-Through (use class A1 / A3) and retail unit (use class A1)
with associated parking, access and landscaping.
Vijay Kaul, Senior Planning Officer, reported the following
updates since the agenda had been published:
- An
email had been received by the Applicant from Councillor Zee
Russell, Ward Member for Ettingshall, stating that she supported
the scheme, however it may be worthwhile asking Historical England
and the Conservation Team what measures they required in order to
meet their approval.
- The Applicant had revised the opening hours to start at 6.00am,
with closing time of 8.00pm for Greggs and 10.00pm for Costa.
Environmental Health still advised later opening of 7.00am and
noise barrier.
- A
full application and Listed Building Consent had now been submitted
for the Royal Hospital site.
Mr Tim Dixon addressed the
Committee and spoke in support of the application.
The
Senior Planning Officer responded to the statements made
and
advised that:
- The statutory test for assessing applications that affected the
setting of Listed Buildings, Conservation Areas and the Development
Plan Policy were set out in the report.
- Historic England, who are the Government’s expert adviser
on England’s Heritage and have a statutory role in the
planning system had stated that the development would cause harm
and that the harm was unjustified.
- Objections had also been raised by the Victorian Society, the
Ancient Monuments Society and All Saints Action Network
(ASAN).
- The Local Planning Authority (LPA) had robustly assessed the
design and heritage impact of the development.
- The proposal would result in harm to the character and
appearance of the Cleveland Road Conservation Area, and harm to the
setting of the Listed Buildings.
A
Member of the Committee welcomed the development however most felt
that the proposals were unacceptable.
Councillor Muston moved the recommendations and Councillor Page
seconded the recommendations.
Resolved:
That planning
application 20/00832/FUL
be refused on the following ground:
- The proposal involves the demolition of warehouse buildings
which contribute to the significance, character and appearance of
Cleveland Road Conservation Area through their layout, scale, form
and materials. The proposed scheme fails to make a positive
contribution to local character and distinctiveness, as it involves
a typical drive through, single storey built form within an area of
surface car parking which does not reflect the pattern of built
form, design quality or scale of development that would be required
to complement the existing context, or the emerging regeneration of
the Royal Hospital development area. The proposal would result in
harm to the character and appearance of the Cleveland Road
Conservation Area, and harm to the setting of the Grade II Listed
Royal Hospital and Locally Listed Dixons Building. The proposal
conflicts with saved Unitary Development Plan Policies HE1, HE4,
HE5, HE6, HE17, HE19, D4, D5, D6, D7, D8, D9, Black Country Core
Strategy Policies CSP4, ENV2 and ENV3, City Centre Area Action Plan
Policies CC8 and CC9, and relevant policies contained within the
National Planning Policy Framework. The public benefits are
insufficient to outweigh the less than substantial harm to the
setting of to Cleveland Road Conservation Area, the Grade II Listed
Royal Hospital and adjacent locally listed building.