Venue: Council Chamber - Civic Centre, St Peter's Square, Wolverhampton WV1 1SH
Contact: Martin Stevens
Tel: 01902 550947 or Email: martin.stevens@wolverhampton.gov.uk
Media
Items
No. |
Item |
1. |
Apologies
[To receive any apologies for
absence].
Additional documents:
Minutes:
An apology was received from Panel Member,
Cllr Milkinderpal Jaspal.
Cllr Jasbir Jaspal sent her apologies as
Cabinet Member for Health & Wellbeing.
Professor David Loughton (Chief Executive of
Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust) and Marsha Foster (Chief Executive
of Black Country Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust) also sent their
apologies.
|
2. |
Declarations of Interest
[To receive any declarations of
interest].
Additional documents:
Minutes:
There were no declarations of interest.
|
3. |
Minutes of previous meeting PDF 127 KB
[To approve the minutes of the previous
meeting as a correct record.]
Additional documents:
Minutes:
Resolved: That the minutes of 12 December 2022
be approved as a correct record.
|
4. |
One Wolverhampton Priorities
[To receive a verbal report on the latest
position regarding, One Wolverhampton Priorities].
Additional documents:
Minutes:
The Chair invited
the Wolverhampton Managing Director of the Integrated Care Board
(ICB) to give a verbal update; The Chair specifically wanted an
update on how the Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust was performing
against its targets.
The Wolverhampton Managing Director ICB informed the Panel that the
ICB had 6 Strategic Working Groups who had been meeting to discuss
their own internal scrutiny. He reported that there had been
progress across all 6 groups. He explained the One Wolverhampton
Board was used by them to have oversight over their contributions
to the Black Country community transformation projects over mental
health work. The One Wolverhampton Board was used to plan and
co-ordinate the Trust’s response to the winter period. He
felt this benefitted the partnership and improved their working
relationships and strategies, highlighting work done around Social
Care Discharge strategies in particular.
The Director of Public Health stated that he felt the One
Wolverhampton Board’s meeting was one where the partners and
Strategic Working Groups remained critical towards their on going
practices for the betterment of their healthcare service. They had
expanded health checks between 40 to 75 year olds, people received
invites and could choose to attend the health checks which were
carried out in some General Practices and the Mander Centre. He
stated that Royal Wolverhampton Trust had kept its vaccination
centre in the Mander Centre for Covid-19 open and had delivered
over 20,000 vaccinations; he believed this to be a solid foundation
to build upon for future healthcare delivery strategies given the
scale of people treated. The Director of Public Health told the
Panel that the Royal Wolverhampton Trust had launched pilot schemes
for screening heart disease and cancer checks and were trying to
close the gap between Wolverhampton and other service areas on that
health issue. This was a strategic decision to attempt to diagnose
conditions early and treat them more effectively. He felt the
partnership working enabled them to cover a broader scope of
inter-related strategies for improving the health and healthcare of
the local population.
The Group Chief Strategy Officer of Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust
said that the data across the City gave them a very clear picture
of what the issues were and this was the basis for their
Transformation Agenda going forwards. He also stated the importance
of maintaining current healthcare service flows and making sure all
the City’s residents were receiving the best healthcare
possible. The Wolverhampton One Board is there to look at
prevention, as well as post healthcare service delivery and
outcomes. The next stage was providing the data to the Strategic
Working Groups so that they would be able to tailor their work
plans better.
The Chair asked how many patients were awaiting discharge from New
Cross Hospital or other Hospitals run by the Royal Wolverhampton
Trust and asked how many of those lived outside of the coverage of
Wolverhampton Council (responsibility of other Councils).The
Director of Adult Services responded there were 76 people waiting
for discharge, 14 were with ...
view the full minutes text for item 4.
|
5. |
Urology Monitoring Report PDF 140 KB
[To receive a monitoring report on Urology
Services following the merger with Walsall].
Additional documents:
Minutes:
The Chair invited
the Group Chief Strategy Officer for the Royal Wolverhampton Trust
to present the report.
The Group Chief Strategy Officer
stated that the aim was that the service would go live by 1 April
2023. He explained that they had planned for slippage which could
result from the combination of the services between Walsall and
Wolverhampton. Areas where issues could arise could occur in data
migration and digital transfer operations. There were currently
10,000 patient data items waiting to be transferred and tests were
being done to ensure digital systems were integrated and working,
he was confident they would meet the deadline set. The Single
On-Call Rota was still an outstanding item to be done, as was the
Patient Tracking List , they were however, on time in the schedule
of work to be done. Transfer of None Elective work had already
commenced and issues were identified and reviewed to make sure the
right patients were being admitted. The Group Chief Strategy
Officer informed the Panel that the Trust had test ran outpatient
clinics at weekends to establish if the service would run smoothly
and reported that all tests were successful. Staffing levels were
on track, with only 3 vacancies left which were due to be
recruited. An advisory was given on the known mitigations and known
potential issues around data transfer. A communication plan was in
place, which included patients and staff. Once this was launched,
patients would be able to book in online and receive updates with
no differences in quality of service during the transfer. They were
requesting the Black Country Clinical Senate undertake a review of
what the Trust had done as part of the Urology transfer. This was
so the Trust could make sure they knew the operation was carried
out as best as possible.
A Panel Member asked how the Trust knew if patients were managing
their appointments on sites out of their normal area of coverage
and if the Trust was monitoring it.
The Group Chief Strategy Officer answered that there was up to 20
percent capacity to enable those who could not travel further
afield to have the service in Wolverhampton. He also stated that
they were continuing to monitor this.
The Chair raised concerns around the transfer to online services,
citing elderly people as an example of a part of the community who
may not be able to use digital systems. The Chair wanted
clarification as to how out-patient services are met with patients
and what the criteria was in deciding that; the Chair also asked
how the communication of changes was done.
The Group Chief Strategy Officer explained to the Panel that it was
a choice based system and that they did have alternatives to
digital. He stated that the criteria was not a catch all system as
each patient has individual needs, judgements were made on a case
by case basis. If patients could not travel, they had different
options at the referral stage to discuss and ...
view the full minutes text for item 5.
|
6. |
Primary Care - Latest Healthwatch Telephone Survey & ICB Report PDF 622 KB
[To receive a report from Healthwatch
Wolverhampton on their latest GP Practices telephone
survey]. [Report is marked: To
Follow].
[To receive a report from the Integrated Care
Board on the latest developments in Primary Care]. [Report is marked: To Follow].
Additional documents:
Minutes:
The Wolverhampton
Managing Director ICB talked the Panel through the report,
a copy of the presentation is attached to the signed
minutes. Referencing section 3.4, the Wolverhampton Managing
Director ICB noted that between July and November 2022 there had
been an increase in the total number of appointments offered by the
General Practice. He highlighted that most of the appointment
increases between June and November were face-to-face appointments.
He stated that all Primary Care Networks now offered additional
hours for appointments which included evening appointments and
appointments between 9 and 5 on weekends. For the winter period,
the Trust had given extra funding to Primary Care Networks so that
they could cover bank holidays.
The Chair invited Healthwatch to give their report and requested
questions for both report items be given after, highlighting the
related nature of the two reports for Scrutiny.
The Engagement Officer for Healthwatch began the presentation,
a copy of the presentation is attached to the signed
minutes. Healthwatch had found that a number
of call handlers had not been made aware that Healthwatch
would be calling and were unaware of their role. They reported that
there had been noticeable improvement since their previous survey
in the number of practices which were willing to participate, one
had worsened. A large number had increased signposting practices to
pharmacies. Other Primary Care Networks had not implemented a call
waiting system since the previous survey and had in fact worsened
in this area, one had not changed. The Healthwatch Engagement
Officer recommended the Primary Care Networks raise awareness of
the role that Healthwatch play, encourage GP participation,
increase signposting to other services to reduce walk in pressures
and review their call waiting systems to make improvements.
The Engagement Officer for Healthwatch covered local practices from
across different wards in terms of their engagement with
Healthwatch and listed various averages in statistics. The
Engagement Officer for Healthwatch invited the Health Scrutiny
Panel to help ensure that recommendations were implemented and to
further work to ensure partners are held accountable.
The Chair thanked everyone for their reports and presentations. She
expressed disappointment that 22.7% of the local General
Practitioners had refused to engage with Healthwatch.
The Manager of Healthwatch
Wolverhampton added that the statistics would have been
worse but she used discretion and
contacted the practices back later on and explained who Healthwatch
were and the legal obligations the NHS had to answer them. She
further stated that if she had not done this, they would have had a
lack of data, she believed this was down to a lack of training with
the receptionists at the General Practices about who Healthwatch
were.
A Councillor said he was concerned that staff did not know who
Healthwatch were, given the consultations between partners that had
been done. He said it was unacceptable and asked the Integrated
Care Board how they could guarantee that the same issues would not
occur again next time Healthwatch do another report.
The Wolverhampton Managing Director ICB answered that
...
view the full minutes text for item 6.
|
7. |
Date of Next Meeting
[The date of the next scheduled Health
Scrutiny Panel is 23 March 2023].
Additional documents:
Minutes:
It was advised that the date of the next
meeting is 23 March 2023 at 1.30pm.
|